MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180421619 · doi:10.1021/ci0497051

Fluorine−Fluorine Spin−Spin Coupling Constants in Aromatic Compounds:  Correlations with the Delocalization Index and with the Internuclear Separation

2005· article· en· W2180421619 on OpenAlexaff
Norberto Castillo, Chérif F. Matta, Russell J. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorineDelocalized electronSpin (aerodynamics)Coupling constantCoupling (piping)Chemical physicsComputational chemistryMaterials scienceChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceMolecular physicsAtomic physicsPhysicsThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryQuantum mechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new empirical approach for the evaluation of fluorine-fluorine spin-spin coupling constants (J(FF)) in aromatic compounds. The correlations between J(FF) and the delocalization index calculated within the framework of the theory of atoms in molecules (AIM) and with the fluorine-fluorine internuclear separation are investigated. Both the internuclear separation and the delocalization index are found to be highly correlated with J(FF). A regression model in which the experimental J(FF) coupling constant is fitted exponentially to the internuclear separation and linearly to the delocalization index yields a squared correlation coefficient as high as 0.96 for a data set consisting of 33 coupling constants spread over a range of 85 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207