MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180492389 · doi:10.1139/v06-003

A simple synthetic route to the formation of tetracopper(I) 2-mercaptothiazoline compounds The crystal structures of [Cu<sub>4</sub>(S-thiaz)<sub>4</sub>(PEt<sub>2</sub>Ph)<sub>2</sub>], [Cu<sub>4</sub>(S-thiaz)<sub>4</sub>(PEt<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>], [Cu<sub>4</sub>(S-thiaz)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub>, and [Cu<sub>4</sub>(S-thiaz)<sub>4</sub>]<sub>4</sub>

2006· article· en· W2180492389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olaf Fuhr, L. Fernandez-Recio, Dieter Fenske

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCopperSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)CrystallographySulfurCrystal structureStereochemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactions of copper(I) acetate with 2-mercaptothiazoline (HS-thiaz) in the presence of tertiary phosphines lead to the formation of tetranuclear sulphur-bridged copper complexes. Depending on the reaction conditions, isolated clusters ([Cu 4 (S-thiaz) 4 (PR 3 ) 2 ] (PR 3 = PPh 3 (1), PEt 2 Ph (2), PEt 3 (3)), oligomeric compounds ([Cu 4 (S-thiaz) 4 ] 2 (4) and [Cu 4 (S-thiaz) 4 ] 4 (5)), or a one-dimensional polymer ([Cu 4 (S-thiaz) 4 ] ∞ (6)) are formed. The structures of the compounds 2–5 have been determined by single crystal X-ray analysis.Key words: copper, 2-mercaptothiazoline, single crystal X-ray analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0220.022
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.015
Bibliometrics0.0130.018
Science and technology studies0.0130.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0170.006
Research integrity0.0120.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207