MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180540500 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22401

Fluid dynamics study of the flow and pressure drop analysis of a non‐Newtonian fluid through annular ducts with unusual cross‐sections

2015· article· en· W2180540500 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Isabele Cristina Bicalho, José Lucas Mognon, Carlos Henrique Ataíde, Cláudio R. Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetrobrasCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMechanicsEccentricity (behavior)Annulus (botany)Pressure dropComputational fluid dynamicsLaminar flowTurbulenceNewtonian fluidConcentricRotation (mathematics)EccentricCylinderReynolds numberFluid dynamicsMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper concerns an experimental and computational study of the laminar flow developed by a pseudoplastic fluid through a partially‐obstructed annulus, considering the effects of eccentricity and inner cylinder rotation. For the eccentric cases the eccentric rotation of the inner tube is applied, which is a novelty in the literature. Pressure drop experimental data are reported for flows of 3 and 9 m 3 /h of a 1 mg/g xanthan gum aqueous solution through a concentric and a 46 % eccentric annulus with partial obstruction of 6 mm, for cases with and without rotation of the inner cylinder (0 and 400 rpm). Numerical simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques which allowed for reporting of axial velocity profiles, apparent viscosity distribution, and pressure drops for a range of eccentricity values (0, 23, and 46 %) and obstruction heights (0, 6, and 12 mm), which were systematically compared for cases with and without rotation of the inner tube (0 and 400 rpm). Comparisons between numerical calculations and the flow data indicated, in general, very close agreement. Eccentric rotation of the inner cylinder presented a distortion effect on the axial velocity and apparent viscosity profiles for the high eccentricity case (46 %) with high obstruction (12 mm), where two maxima regions were observed, one of them near the inner cylinder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207