MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180878254 · doi:10.5167/uzh-64476

Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM 2012)

2012· article· en· W2180878254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert Stevens, David Robertson, Goran Nenadić

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDirectorate for Biological SciencesNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceAmbiguityIdentification (biology)Set (abstract data type)SoftwareTask (project management)Matching (statistics)Information retrievalDatabaseBaseline (sea)Programming languageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutation grounding is an automated process which links mutation annotations to specific protein sequences and their variants.This is a non-trivial algorithmic task and a number of approaches have been developed, albeit the scalability of existing implementations is still an issue hindering their adoption.In this work we transform a proof-of-concept mutation grounding prototype showing acceptable performance on a modest homogeneous corpus, into a robust system capable of processing a wide range of publications with high precision and recall through rational redesign of the algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207