Influence of Planarity and Size on Guest Binding with Sodium Cholate Aggregates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bile salt aggregates are supramolecular structures with two types of binding sites, called primary and secondary sites. The objective of this work was to explore how the nonplanarity and size of guests (biphenyl [BP], 1-1'-binaphthyl [BNP] and dibenz[b,f]oxepin [DBX]) affected their binding affinity and dynamics to sodium cholate (NaC) aggregates. Fluorescence and laser-flash photolysis experiments were performed to obtain information on the binding environment for the guests, the accessibility of quenchers to guests in the aggregate and the dissociation rate constants of the guests from the aggregates. All guests were bound to the more hydrophobic primary aggregate, showing that this site can accommodate nonplanar molecules. However, the structure of the guest affects the structure of the primary aggregates, leading to changes in the accessibility of anions to aggregate-bound guests and to changes for the guest dissociation rate constants from the aggregates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".