MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180959024 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2010.2081662

Enhancing the Performance of Conjugate Gradient Solvers on Graphic Processing Units

2011· article· en· W2180959024 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Mehri Dehnavi, D. Maroto Fernández, Dennis D. Giannacopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugate gradient methodComputer scienceConjugateParallel computingComputational scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmMathematicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of the fundamental obstacles to accelerate the preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) method on modern graphic processing units (GPUs) is presented and several techniques are proposed to enhance its performance over previous work independent of the GPU generation and the matrix sparsity pattern. The proposed enhancements increase the performance of PCG up to 23 times compared to vector optimized PCG results on modern CPUs and up to 3.4 times compared to previous GPU results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207