MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2180976690 · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1507

Religious coping and its influence on psychological distress, medication adherence, and quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease

2015· article· en· W2180976690 on OpenAlexaff
Thiago Holanda Freitas, Thomas Hyphantis, Elias Andreoulakis, João Quevedo, Hesley Lucena Landim Miranda, Gilberto Sousa Alves, Marcellus Henrique Loiola Ponte de Souza, Lúcia Libanez Bessa Campelo Braga, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Joanna K. Soczynska, Roger S. McIntyre, André F. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Psychiatry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsCoping (psychology)AnxietyClinical psychologyMedicineHospital Anxiety and Depression ScalePsychological adaptationDistressPsychological distressQuality of life (healthcare)Inflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseUlcerative colitisPsychiatryMental healthPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology→French-language works237,207→