Nonlinear behaviour of reinforced concrete conical tanks under hydrostatic pressure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among the different shapes available, conical vessels are commonly used as water reservoirs because of their large storage capacities. Motivated by the lack of guidelines available for their analysis and design in the existing codes of practice, this study focuses on analyzing reinforced concrete conical tanks under the effect of hydrostatic pressure. A finite element model (FEM), which accounts for material nonlinearity experienced in reinforced concrete, is developed. This nonlinearity is considered by implementing a concrete plasticity constitutive model in the developed FEM. Analysis of a set of 12 tanks with different practical dimensions is performed under hydrostatic water pressure. The variations of meridional and hoop stresses through the thickness of the tanks are determined by plotting the stresses at the outer faces of the tank’s wall. The effect of including material nonlinearity in the FEM on the deformed shape is assessed. The developed FEM is used to find the location of maximum deflection and stresses. The variations in the maximum deflection and stresses with the dimensional parameters of the conical vessel are reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it