Présider les séances de la Convention nationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lors de la séance du 21 septembre 1792, Collot d’Herbois propose l’abolition de la royauté ; après quelques débats, elle est acceptée à l’unanimité, malgré les réserves d’un Quinette suscitant des murmures d’improbations. L’entrée en république, cependant, crée un vide, et pas seulement parce que l’exécutif est à rebâtir. Dans les circonstances nouvelles, le président de la Convention conserve-t-il le même rôle, les mêmes pouvoirs et la même image que ses prédécesseurs ? Étudier les quatre-vingt onze députés qui ont assuré, un moment ou un autre, la présidence de cette Assemblée révolutionnaire, c’est s’interroger sur l’origine de ces hommes, sur leurs convictions et leurs pouvoirs, mais aussi sur les moyens dont ils disposaient pour assurer des débats ordonnés et sereins.In the session of September 21, 1792, Collot d'Herbois proposed the abolition of the monarchy. After some debate, the proposal was unanimously accepted, the reservations of Quinette having aroused disapproving murmurs. The transition to the Republic, however, created a vacuum, and not only because the executive power had to be reconstructed. In these new circumstances, would the president of the Convention retain his same role, the same powers, and the same image of his predecessors ? To study the ninety-one deputies that at one time or another occupied the presidency of this revolutionary assembly involves not only examining their social origins, their convictions, their powers, but also considering the means these men possessed to ensure that debates remained orderly and calm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".