Spatio-Temporal Pyramid Model based on depth maps for action recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel human action recognition method by using depth maps. Each depth frame in a depth video sequence is projected onto three orthogonal Cartesian planes. Under each projection view, we divide the entire depth maps into several sub-actions. The absolute difference between two consecutive projected maps is accumulated through a depth video (several sub-actions) sequence to form a Depth Motion Map (DMM) to describe the dynamic feature of an action. Also the difference within the threshold between two consecutive projected maps is calculated through the entire depth video to form another kind of Depth Static Map (DSM) to describe the static feature. Collectively, we call them Temporal Pyramid of Depth Model (TPDM). Then Spatial Pyramid Histograms of Oriented Gradient (SPHOG) is computed from the TPDM for the representation of an action. For classification, we apply support vector machine (SVM) to classify the proposed descriptorsbased on MSR Action3D dataset. Experimental results demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".