Comparative Inactivation Studies of <i>Listeria Monocytogenes</i> at Room and Refrigeration Temperatures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes is an important food-borne pathogen which has been associated with disease outbreaks from contaminated ready-to-eat meat products due to the improper decontamination of the equipment and food-processing areas. As this bacterium maintains the ability to grow at the low temperatures used in food-processing plants, this study was undertaken to determine the bactericidal efficacy of liquid disinfectants and the effect that low temperatures have on their efficacy. A standardized disinfectant testing method, the quantitative carrier test 2 (QCT-2), was used to assess the bactericidal activity of five commercially available disinfectants and four disinfectants currently used in Canadian food-processing plants at both room temperature and refrigeration temperature. The disinfectants tested varied in their ability to inactivate L. monocytogenes; with Ethanol, VigorOX, Divosan Plus, Oxonia Active, and SU393 performing the best for use in food-processing plants. Little to no significant difference in efficacy was observed for these disinfectants at refrigeration temperature compared to room temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it