MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2181550276

Stratigraphy, Basin Morphology and Hydrocarbon Potential of Middle to Upper Cretaceous Strata, Eagle Plain Basin, Northern Yukon

2011· article· en· W2181550276 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin W. Jackson, Michael McQuilkin, L S Lane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinPaleontologyOutcropEagleCretaceousCenomanianBedrockGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The Eagle Plain Basin is a relatively unexplored intermontane basin located in northern Yukon with proven hydrocarbon potential (Figure 1). Previous studies of the middle Albian-Cenomanian Parkin Formation and the Turonian Fishing Branch Formation are based on broad lithostratigraphic correlations. The objective of this study is to refine the stratigraphic framework for the middle to upper Cretaceous succession of the Eagle Plain Basin by integrating seismic, outcrop, core, well log and petrographic data. Comparison of new data with research from adjacent basins is vital to understanding regional scale sedimentation patterns and paleogeography in northern Yukon and Northwest Territories. Hydrocarbon potential of the region is particularly significant in light of recent cabinet approval for the proposed Mackenzie Valley Pipeline. Figure 1. Geological map of northern Yukon Territory indicating location of the Eagle Plain Basin (outlined in red) and major geomorphological elements. Cretaceous bedrock (green and blue-green on map) underlies the majority of Eagle Plain at surface. (Modified from Norris, 1984)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→