MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181663759

First Steps in Ifremer's Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Program- A 3000m Depth Operational Survey AUV for Environmental Monitoring

2004· article· en· W2181663759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarineUnderwaterMarine engineeringEngineeringGeneral partnershipEnvironmental scienceAeronauticsOceanographyGeologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the new Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Program launched by the French Institute for the Sustainable Exploitation of the Sea (Ifremer), for new programs related to environmental survey and monitoring. For several years Ifremer has been involved in technological development of intervention AUVs in collaboration with industrial partners. Historically, Ifremer was also a pioneer of underwater vehicles with the deep sea AUV, Epaulard in the 80’s (Michel et al. 84). The first step in the new Coastal AUV program is the development of a 3000m depth survey AUV, described in this paper and built by International Submarine Engineering, in partnership with French partners such as Cybernetix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it