MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2181703124

The Short-Term Effects of Joint Mobilizations on Acute Mechanical Low Back Dysfunction in Collegiate Athletes.

2005· article· en· W2181703124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Hanrahan, Bonnie L. Van Lunen, Michael Tamburello, Martha Walker

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical therapyMedicineContext (archaeology)Isometric exerciseRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRange of motionVisual analogue scaleJoint mobilizationJoint painCryotherapyLow back painAthletesMcGill Pain QuestionnaireSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Although a variety of theories and studies have been cited to support the use of joint mobilization in the spine as an integral part of the treatment and rehabilitation process, information about the short-term effects of joint mobilization on acute low back injury with respect to patient pain and strength changes has been limited.Objective: To examine the short-term effects of grade 1 and 2 posteroanterior joint mobilizations at the lumbar spine on subject pain and muscle force after an episode of acute, mechanical low back pain.Design: Group (2) by time (2 or 3).Setting: Athletic training clinic.Patients or Other Participants: Male collegiate athletes (n = 19) with mechanical low back pain as assessed through a standardized evaluation were randomly assigned to a control (n = 10) or experimental (n = 9) group.Intervention(s): All subjects underwent a standardized treatment protocol of cryotherapy and stretching during data collection. Subjects completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire and a visual analog scale (the latter to assess pain levels during range-of-motion activities) and, using a handheld dynamometer, performed 3 maximum voluntary isometric contractions to determine muscle force. Grade 1 and 2 joint mobilizations were administered to the experimental group, whereas the control group was placed in a prone position of comfort for the time it took to perform the joint mobilizations.Main Outcome Measure(s): Baseline, immediate posttreatment, and 24-hour posttreatment measurements of pain and muscle force were taken.Results: Compared with the control group, the experimental group demonstrated significant decreases in the sensory subscale scores of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and in pain during lumbar extension and a significant increase in force production.Conclusions: Grade 1 and 2 joint mobilizations reduced subjects' pain and increased force production in the short-term stages of mechanical low back pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→