Effects of potassium channel modulators on myotropic responses of aortic rings of pregnant rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contribution of potassium channels [ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) and high-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK(Ca)) channels] in the resistance of aortic rings of term pregnant rats to phenylephrine (Phe), arginine vasopressin (AVP), and KCl was investigated. Concentration-response curves to tetraethylammonium (TEA), a nonselective K(+) channel inhibitor, were obtained in the absence or presence of KCl. TEA induced by itself concentration-dependent responses only in aortic rings of nonpregnant rats. These responses to TEA could be modulated in both groups of rings by preincubation with different concentrations of KCl. Concentration-response curves to Phe, AVP, and KCl were obtained in the absence or presence of cromakalim or NS-1619 (K(ATP) and BK(Ca) openers, respectively) and glibenclamide or iberiotoxin (K(ATP) and BK(Ca) inhibitors, respectively). Cromakalim significantly inhibited the responses to the three agonists in a concentration-dependent manner in both groups of rats. Alternatively, in the pregnant group of rats, glibenclamide increased the sensitivity to all three agonists. NS-1619 also inhibited the response to all agonists. With AVP and KCl, its effect was greater in aortic rings of pregnant than nonpregnant rats. Finally, iberiotoxin increased the sensitivity to all three agents. This effect was more important in aortic rings of nonpregnant rats and was accompanied by an increase of the maximal response to Phe and AVP. These results suggest that potassium channels are implicated in the control of basal membrane potential and in the blunted responses to these agents during pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".