MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181867859

The Lu-Hf isotope system in the Acasta gneiss complex (NWT, Canada)

2013· article· en· W2181867859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Guitreau, Janne Blichert‐Toft, S. J. Mojzsis, Antoine S. G. Roth, Bernard Bourdon, Wouter Bleeker

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyHadeanArcheanGeochemistryGneissZirconFelsicMetamorphic rockMaficIsochronCrustal recyclingOutcropCrustContinental crust
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Acasta gneiss complex (AGC) is an outcrop of poly-phase Hadean/Eoarchean rocks that records a multistage history. We explore the complexities encountered in such an old crustal remnant at the mineral- to outcrop scale and discuss the preservation and disturbance of the Lu-Hf isotope system in these rocks. Twenty-one new Lu-Hf isotope whole rock measurements are used in combination with previous data to show that some samples have been disturbed by metamorphic garnet growth and/or migmatization/mineral segregation while others clearly preserve their Lu-Hf isotope systematics. Two main Archean magmatic events to be identified at around 3600 and 3960 Ma and an almost purely metamorphic event at about 3750 Ma. Least-contaminated gneisses indicate a Lu-Hf isochron age range of 3929 84 to 3945 91 Ma for the oldest rocks that range from mafic to felsic. This age discrepancy relative to 3960 Ma is likely due to crust assimilation. This process is significant in both magmatic groups in the AGC as also observed by previous authors. However, our study demonstrates that crustal contamination is widespread but not ubiquitous and, according to assimilation calculations, the least contaminated samples identified here indicate a near-CHUR Hf isotope composition for the mantle source of 3960 Ma group. Comparison between Hf isotopes in >3.9 Ga detrital zircons from North-American Archean meta-sedimentary basins and those in Acasta gneisses indicate a possible connection that would in turn imply that the AGC was volumetrically significant. Analogy with western Australian Hadean zircon bearing meta-sedimentary belts would point out to local effects in early crustal record in favor of progressive (but not continuous) crustal growth as independent crustal segments in the Hadean-Eoarchean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207