MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2181870026

TOWNSHIP RECEIVES JOINT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUNDING

2013· article· en· W2181870026 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samah Othman, Hugh Murray

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackupGovernment (linguistics)BusinessPreparednessEmergency managementJoint (building)Emergency responseService (business)Plan (archaeology)FinancePublic administrationOperations managementMedical emergencyEngineeringPolitical scienceMarketingMedicineGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oro-Medonte, ON – The Township of Oro-Medonte would like to extend their thanks and appreciation to the federal government for the Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP) funding received, which provides various equipment to enhance the operation of the Emergency Operation Centre (EOC) for the Township of Oro-Medonte. The JEPP funding is provincially managed by Emergency Management Ontario (EMO) on behalf of the federal government. The funding is on a 55:45 cost sharing arrangement, with the federal government paying 45%. The amount of the federal contribution is approximately $7,740. The Township used the funding to purchase a radio repeater, with battery backup, to be utilized with the additional radio frequency that was acquired. The purchase of the telecommunications system will enable the Township to provide a reliable level of service and access in the event of a power outage and/or the Emergency Plan is implemented. The Joint Emergency Preparedness Program was established in October 1980 to enhance the national capacity to respond to all types of emergencies and to enhance the resiliency of critical infrastructure. JEPP is administered by Public Safety Canada. For more information regarding the Township of Oro-Medonte’s Emergency Response Plan, please visit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4150.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisaster Management and Resilience→French-language works237,207→