MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181994167 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab183

183 IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION: A TOOL TO PRESERVE THE THREATENED WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE)

2015· article· en· W2181994167 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. P. Cervantes, J. M. Palomino, M. Anzar, R.J. Mapletoft, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsToronto ZooAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonBiologyIn vitro maturationFollicular phaseAndrologyHuman fertilizationIn vivoEstrous cycleEmbryoAnimal scienceOocyteEndocrinologyAnatomyEcologyMedicineBiotechnologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro embryo production is being developed as a tool to restore genetic diversity and eliminate endemic disease in wood bison. In a recent study in wood bison, we found that more oocytes reached maturity after 30 h v. 24 h of in vivo maturation following hCG treatment (Cervantes et al. 2014 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 26, 199). An additional 4 h of in vitro maturation after an in vivo maturation period of 30 h also had a positive effect on developmental competence. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that extending the in vivo maturation time (i.e. extending the interval between hCG treatment and cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) collection) from 30 to 34 h will improve in vitro embryo production in wood bison. Follicular wave development was synchronised among female wood bison (n = 28, 6 to 10 years old) by transvaginal follicular ablation. The study was done in 4 replicates (n = 7 bison per replicate). Bison were given FSH 1 day (300 mg) and 3 days (100 mg) after ablation for ovarian superstimulation, and hCG (2500 IU) 5 days after ablation to induce COC maturation in vivo. Bison were divided randomly into 2 groups (n = 14/group) in which COC were collected transvaginally at either 30 h or 34 h after hCG treatment. Expanded COC from the 30 h group were fertilised after 4 h of in vitro maturation, while expanded COC from the 34 h group were fertilised immediately. Oocytes and sperm were co-incubated (Day 0 = day of fertilization) for 18 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air and high humidity. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in 4-well dishes containing 500 µL well–1 of CR1aa medium at 38.5°C, 5% CO2, 5% O2, 90% N2 and high humidity, and assessed on Days 3, 7, and 8 (Day 0 = day of fertilization). Data were compared between groups by Chi-squared analysis. No effect of replicate was found. Compared to the 30 h group, the 34 h group had a greater cleavage rate [55/74 (74%) v. 49/86 (57%); (P < 0.05)], and a greater blastocyst rate on Day 7 [25/74 (34%) v. 9/86 (10%); (P < 0.05)] and Day 8 [(40/74 (54.1%) v. 32/86 (37.2%); (P < 0.05)]. We concluded that an extended period of in vivo maturation is beneficial for embryo production after in vitro fertilization in wood bison. We thank Vetoquinol Canada for providing FSH (Folltropin-V) and hyaluronan (MAP-5) and thank Merck Animal Health for hCG (Chorulon).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207