183 IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION: A TOOL TO PRESERVE THE THREATENED WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro embryo production is being developed as a tool to restore genetic diversity and eliminate endemic disease in wood bison. In a recent study in wood bison, we found that more oocytes reached maturity after 30 h v. 24 h of in vivo maturation following hCG treatment (Cervantes et al. 2014 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 26, 199). An additional 4 h of in vitro maturation after an in vivo maturation period of 30 h also had a positive effect on developmental competence. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that extending the in vivo maturation time (i.e. extending the interval between hCG treatment and cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) collection) from 30 to 34 h will improve in vitro embryo production in wood bison. Follicular wave development was synchronised among female wood bison (n = 28, 6 to 10 years old) by transvaginal follicular ablation. The study was done in 4 replicates (n = 7 bison per replicate). Bison were given FSH 1 day (300 mg) and 3 days (100 mg) after ablation for ovarian superstimulation, and hCG (2500 IU) 5 days after ablation to induce COC maturation in vivo. Bison were divided randomly into 2 groups (n = 14/group) in which COC were collected transvaginally at either 30 h or 34 h after hCG treatment. Expanded COC from the 30 h group were fertilised after 4 h of in vitro maturation, while expanded COC from the 34 h group were fertilised immediately. Oocytes and sperm were co-incubated (Day 0 = day of fertilization) for 18 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air and high humidity. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in 4-well dishes containing 500 µL well–1 of CR1aa medium at 38.5°C, 5% CO2, 5% O2, 90% N2 and high humidity, and assessed on Days 3, 7, and 8 (Day 0 = day of fertilization). Data were compared between groups by Chi-squared analysis. No effect of replicate was found. Compared to the 30 h group, the 34 h group had a greater cleavage rate [55/74 (74%) v. 49/86 (57%); (P < 0.05)], and a greater blastocyst rate on Day 7 [25/74 (34%) v. 9/86 (10%); (P < 0.05)] and Day 8 [(40/74 (54.1%) v. 32/86 (37.2%); (P < 0.05)]. We concluded that an extended period of in vivo maturation is beneficial for embryo production after in vitro fertilization in wood bison. We thank Vetoquinol Canada for providing FSH (Folltropin-V) and hyaluronan (MAP-5) and thank Merck Animal Health for hCG (Chorulon).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".