Successful term delivery following second-trimester excision of a massive hydrosalpinx presenting as an adnexal mass in pregnancy: management and considerations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the best of the authors' knowledge, a massive hydrosalpinx presenting as an adnexal mass complicating pregnancy has never been reported. They report the case of a 26-year-old female diagnosed with a persistent right adnexal cyst in a pregnancy resulting from spontaneous conception, confirmed to be a 30-cm. hydrosalpinx at the time of surgery. Though laparoscopy was envisioned, due to the size of the mass, a right salpingectomy was performed during the second trimester by laparotomy, and the patient had an uncomplicated course of her pregnancy following the intervention, delivering a healthy infant at term. Herein, the authors explore the potential etiologies and different considerations when faced with an adnexal mass in pregnancy. They emphasize that, though rare and uncommon, a hydrosalpinx should be included in the differential diagnosis of persistent adnexal cysts in pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".