MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182049809 · doi:10.5539/ijms.v7n6p137

The Influence of Price Structures on Experience Quality and Behavior Intention in Hospitality Industry

2015· article· en· W2182049809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kuok Wei Chong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marketing Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketingTourismHospitalityQuality (philosophy)Hospitality industryContext (archaeology)PurchasingOrder (exchange)BusinessProduct (mathematics)Automotive industryPerspective (graphical)Consumer behaviourAdvertisingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourism is one of the largest industries in the world as well as the significant contributors to the world's economy. According to the UNWTO, the export income enervated by international tourism ranks fourth after fuels, chemicals, and automotive product. In 2011, there were over 983 million international tourist arrivals worldwide, representing a growth of 4.6% when compared to 940 million in 2010. The attribution of pricing structures and experience quality played an important in determinant of buying behaviour in the sense where these principles are likely to remain important factors or elements whether shoppers are purchasing online or through another medium such as online travel sites or traditional agents. To narrow down the author research, author is selecting Malaysia as a based to examine how the influences of price structures are has affected the experience quality and customers behaviour intention in selecting a hotel to stay. A theoretical framework is formulated in order to achieve the results by revealing the influence of price structures towards the experience quality and behaviour intention with incorporated the Hedonic pricing model. This study has contribution from both a theoretical and a practical perspective. First, the relationships between price structures and experience quality, and behavioural intentions were examined. Second, little price structure toward experience quality research has been conducted in the area of hospitality context. This paper aims to provide a further study for future researchers, especially hotel managers to have an in depth understanding of price structures towards experience quality in the hospitality industry. While it also helps hotel managers to implement all their pricing strategies where pricing is an issue of paramount importance for practitioners in the hospitality industry and It is the only element in the accommodation marketing mix that impacts directly on revenues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marketing StudiesSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207