MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182076918

Mapping Basement Structures in the Peace River Arch of Alberta Using Monogenic Signal Decomposition of Magnetic Data

2013· article· en· W2182076918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hassan H. Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySIGNAL (programming language)Magnetic surveyMagnetic anomalyComputer scienceMineralogyRemote sensingGeophysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Magnetic method is well-known as one of the most powerful tools used to map concealed geological structures especially those associated with magnetic crystalline basements. Crystalline Basements play an important roll in oil and gas exploration in sedimentary basins because they influence the geology of the overlying sedimentary rocks and subsequently on the formation of their oil and gas plays. Magnetic data are in general characterized by their low contrast and poor signal-to-noise ratio and therefore it is always challenging to extract subtle geological features from these data. Therefore, image enhancement is vital for extracting optimum geological and structural information from magnetic data. In this abstract, a new magnetic image enhancement approach is proposed. This approach is based on a recently developed digital processing technique known as monogenic signal decomposition. This new technique is able to decompose 2D magnetic signals into three primary attributes (amplitude, phase and orientation) and two secondary attributes (directional Hilbert and Riesz transform). Although many magnetic attributes have been utilized to map subtle geologic features, these five attributes appear to add more valuable information to magnetic data interpretation. The aim of this study is therefore to explore the monogenic signal decomposition approach as an alternative technique to extract geological and structural information from magnetic data. This abstract therefore describes the rotation-invariant monogenic signal decomposition and demonstrate their use in enhancing magnetic data. The monogenic signal decomposition technique was first tested on the total magnetic intensity (TMI) grid of a synthetic magnetic data and after obtaining satisfactory results the technique was applied to real magnetic data. The synthetic magnetic data was derived from Bishop 3D magnetic model whereas the real data was derived from an aeromagnetic survey flown over the Peace River Arch structure of Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The results obtained from the synthetic and read data indicate that the proposed approach has excellent performance in extracting structural features especially geological boundaries, faults and fractures from the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207