Co-ordination media in cross-national networks of small and medium-sized enterprises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Not only large corporations but also SMEs increasingly organise into crossborder networks, in order to benefit from the advantages of international division of labour.As regards the co-ordination of network activities it makes sense to distinguish between the role of social co-ordination media and the factual and temporal co-ordination of network activities.Social co-ordination media are geared to the generation of mutual "reliability".Their mode of operating is closely linked to the internal power structures of the networks.Nicht nur Großunternehmen, sondern auch Kleine und Mittlere Unternehmen schließen sich in wachsendem Maße zu grenzüberschreitenden Netzwerken zusammen, um die Vorteile der internationalen Arbeitsteilung zu nutzen.Hinsichtlich der Koordinierung von Netzwerksaktivitäten macht es Sinn, zwischen dem Wirken sozialer Koordinierungsmedien und der sachlichzeitlichen Koordinierung von Teilaktivitäten zu unterscheiden.Die sozialen Koordinierungsmedien sind auf die wechselseitige Generierung von Verlässlichkeit ("Relianz") ausgerichtet.Ihre Wirkungsweise hängt mit charakteristischen Machtstrukturen innerhalb der Netzwerke zusammen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".