MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2182092199

Seismic Detection of Cracks in Carbonates Associated with Potash Mining

2009· article· en· W2182092199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zimin Zhang, Robert R. Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPotashEvaporiteDrillingGeophoneSeismologyOverburdenSeismogramMining engineeringGeochemistrySedimentary rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Brine inflow in a mine, resulting from cracks or fractures in overlying strata, can be a significant problem. This paper investigates whether cracked or fractured rock, associated with potash mining in western Canada, might be detectable by multi-component seismic methods. Rock physics modeling was carried out to simulate cracked rocks overlying a potash ore zone. The Kuster-Toksoz procedure modeled randomly distributed cracks while Hudson’s formulation was used for aligned cracks in a carbonate interval (the Dawson Bay including the Second Red Bed Shale) overlying the Prairie Evaporites. We find that cracked rocks can display a significant velocity decrease for both P- and S-velocities. For aligned cracks, velocity anisotropy was also observed. Synthetic seismograms for these cracked media show some character change (time shifts, amplitude variation with offset) compared with uncracked responses. The results provide promise for the detection of cracked rock using multi-component seismic data and repeated surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→