MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182124029 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2007-0029

THE LAGRANGIAN DERIVATION OF KANE’S EQUATIONS

2007· article· en· W2182124029 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kourosh Parsa

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsLagrangian and Eulerian specification of the flow fieldKinetic energyPartial derivativeGeneralized coordinatesEquations of motionMathematicsExpression (computer science)Material derivativeMotion (physics)LagrangianClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisDerivative (finance)Time derivativeDynamics (music)PhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lagrangian approach to the development of dynamics equations for a multi-body system, constrained or otherwise, requires solving the forward kinematics of the system at velocity level in order to derive the kinetic energy of the system. The kinetic-energy expression should then be differentiated multiple times to derive the equations of motion of the system. Among these differentiations, the partial derivative of kinetic energy with respect to the system generalized coordinates is specially cumbersome. In this paper, we will derive this partial derivative using a novel kinematic relation for the partial derivative of angular velocity with respect to the system generalized coordinates. It will be shown that, as a result of the use of this relation, the equations of motion of the system are directly derived in the form of Kane’s equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207