MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182125867 · doi:10.21553/rev-jec.15

Design, Simulation, and Performance Analysis of an INS/GPS System using Parallel Kalman Filters Structure

2011· article· en· W2182125867 on OpenAlex
Paul Fortier, Huu-Tue Huynh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREV Journal on Electronics and Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersĐại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
KeywordsInertial navigation systemKalman filterGPS/INSGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceNavigation systemInertial frame of referenceDimension (graph theory)Control theory (sociology)Control engineeringSimulationAssisted GPSEngineeringReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thanks to the strong growth of MEMS technology, the Inertial Navigation System (INS) is widely applied to navigation and guidance of moving objects. However, there exist errors in the inertial sensor’s signals that cause unacceptable drifts. To minimize these effects on the INS system, a GPS is usually employed simultaneously with an INS in order to increase the dimension of the system; the desired parameters are estimated by Kalman filtering technique applied to the enlarged system. In this paper, we present the design, simulation and performance analysis of an INS/GPS system using two parallel Kaman filters in order to increase the accuracy of the parameter estimation process. The results show that this system could be efficiently brought to practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it