MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182175677 · doi:10.58459/icce.2010.71

Study on Learning Effect by Active Manipulation using Tangible Solar System Teaching Equipment

2010· article· en· W2182175677 on OpenAlexaff
Norio Setozaki, Tutomu Iwasaki, Yusuke Morita

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Computers in Education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionMultimediaLearning effectMathematics educationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to clarify the learning effect through an active manipulation of tangible solar system teaching equipment that was synchronized with a model manipulation. A teaching practice using the tangible solar system teaching equipment was carried out with high school students who had previously been taught using multi-view VR teaching equipment. As a result, an improvement in the understanding levels of students with low proficiency was observed. It is suggested that active manipulation of the teaching equipment may contribute to the improvement of students’ levels of understanding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Computers in EducationSame topicEducation and Learning InterventionsFrench-language works237,207