MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182221821 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2013-0215

Enhanced analysis of pile flexural behavior due to installation of adjacent pile

2014· article· en· W2182221821 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K.K. Tho, Zongrui Chen, C. F. Leung, Yean Khow Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileBending momentStage (stratigraphy)Geotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringMoment (physics)Process (computing)Finite element methodField (mathematics)Eulerian pathComputer scienceGeologyEngineeringMathematicsApplied mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The installation of piles causes lateral soil movements which will induce additional lateral loading on adjacent existing piles. A simplified two-stage approach is conventionally adopted to quantify the installation effect on an adjacent pile. The first stage involves estimating the free-field lateral soil movement profile due to the pile installation process, and this is then applied as input to a pile–soil interaction analysis in the second stage. Such an approach is computationally efficient, but its efficacy has not been rigorously assessed due to the lack of reliable rigorous reference solutions. In this study, the Eulerian finite element approach is applied to obtain rigorous reference solutions for the response of an existing pile due to the installation of an adjacent pile. The efficacy of the two-stage approach is then evaluated against these reference solutions. It is found that the bending moment profiles generated using the simplified two-stage approach deviate significantly from the reference solutions. The shortcomings of the existing two-stage approach are identified, and an improved analysis method denoted as the Enhanced Multi-Stage Approach is proposed and validated in this paper. The results based on the Enhanced Multi-Stage Approach are found to be in good agreement with the more rigorous reference solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207