MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182236533

SUGGESTED REFINEMENTS TO COURSES ON DERIVATIVES: PRESENTATION OF VALUATION EQUATIONS, PAY OFF DIAGRAMS AND MANAGERIAL APPLICATION FOR SECOND GENERATION OPTIONS

2004· article· en· W2182236533 on OpenAlex
Christopher G. Deacon, Alex Faseruk, Robert A. Strong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValuation (finance)Stochastic gamePopularityPresentation (obstetrics)Mathematical economicsComputer scienceGraduate studentsEconomicsSociologyAccountingPolitical scienceLawPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This pedagogical paper should help enrich the derivatives course that are delivered to both graduate and undergraduate students. We provide pricing formulae and payoff diagrams for some of the more popular second generation or exotic options. In spile of their growing popularity. cu rrent textbooks usually provide only cursory definitions. often without supporting mathematical equations, payoff diagrams and, most imponantiy. examples of their managerial application. This paper presents valuation equations. payoff diagrams and managerial applications for binary. lookback. choo~er, compound, Bermuda. ASian, barrier and forward stan options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it