MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182378989 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2015.7343450

Min-max energy-efficiency analysis of multiuser wireless systems

2015· article· en· W2182378989 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Naeem, Alagan Anpalagan, Muhammad Jaseemuddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationFractional programmingComputer scienceIterative methodEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Efficient energy useConvex optimizationWirelessWireless networkParametric programmingNonlinear programmingParametric statisticsMultiuser detectionLinear programmingGeometric programmingAlgorithmNonlinear systemRegular polygonMathematicsComputer networkCode division multiple accessTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an optimal power allocation scheme that minimizes the energy per bit of worst user (i.e., the user with highest energy per bit) in a multiuser wireless communication network. The problem of determining energy efficient power allocation to improve the worst user is a constrained non-convex nonlinear fractional programming problem. We propose an iterative energy efficient power allocation algorithm that guarantees optimal solution. We use parametric equivalent formulation to get the optimal solution. Numerical solutions obtained using simulations are presented and compared with equal power allocation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207