MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182443159 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv484

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

2015· article· en· W2182443159 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicoletta Colombo, Carien L. Creutzberg, Frédéric Amant, Tjalling Bosse, Antonio González-Martı́n, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Christian Marth, Remi A. Nout, Denis Querleu, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Cristiana Sessa, Miguel Abal, Özden Altundağ, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Susana Banerjee, Antonio Casado, L Chiva de Agustín, David Cibula, José María Del Campo, Günter Emons, Frédéric Goffin, Stefano Greggi, Christine Haie-Méder, Dionyssios Katsaros, Vesna Kesić, Christian Kurzeder, Sigurd Lax, Fabrice Lécuru, Tally Levy, Domenica Lorusso, Johanna Mäenpää, Xavier Matías‐Guiu, Philippe Morice, Hans W. Nijman, Melanie Powell, Nicholas Reed, Alexandros Rodolakis, Helga B. Salvesen, Jalid Sehouli, Alexandra Taylor, Anneke M. Westermann, Alain G. Zeimet

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNIH Clinical CenterNational Cancer InstituteTaysUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterUniversità degli Studi di MilanoBarts Health NHS TrustEuropean Society for Medical OncologyInstitut BergoniéServicio Gallego de SaludHaukeland UniversitetssjukehusUniversità degli Studi di TorinoRigshospitaletRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenMcGill UniversityGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenUniversitat de LleidaGentofte HospitalLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversiteit LeidenMcGill University Health CentreTampereen YliopistoRijksuniversiteit GroningenInstitut Gustave-RoussyUniverzita Karlova v Praze
KeywordsMedicineConsensus conferenceEndometrial cancerGynecologyOncologyMedical physicsCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,380
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207