MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2182562243 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.17231.91048

Surveillance activities under the Northwest Territories Bison Control Area Program (1987-2000)

2002· article· en· W2182562243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John S. Nishi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonHerdMycobacterium bovisGeographyBrucella abortusBrucellosisNational parkDisease controlVeterinary medicineTuberculosisArchaeologyBiologyEnvironmental healthEcologyMedicineMycobacterium tuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1987, the Bison Control Area (BCA) program was established to reduce the risk of contact between healthy free-ranging bison (Bison bison) herds in the Northwest Territories and those bison in and around Wood Buffalo National Park (WBNP) which are infected with bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) and brucellosis (Brucella abortus). In this paper, I summarize the main results of this surveillance program since its inception. I also review recent data on health status of the Mackenzie wood bison herd and then outline issues and considerations for the future of the BCA program. Since diseased bison in and around WBNP represent a continued threat of disease exposure to healthy bison in the Mackenzie and Nahanni herds, my principle recommendation is to continue the BCA and maintain surveillance in the buffer zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→