MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182697641

An Update on Performance Optimization and Efficiency Improvement Programs completed at State Electricity Board Operated Coal Fired Power Plants in India through the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP)

2009· article· en· W2182697641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen K. Storm, Jacob Stover, Scott M. Smouse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy securityGeneral partnershipElectricity generationElectricityWork (physics)Renewable energyBusinessNatural resource economicsEnvironmental economicsEconomic growthEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringPower (physics)EconomicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The governments of Australia, Canada, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and the United States have agreed to work with private sector partners under the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) to meet goals for energy security, national air pollution reduction, and climate change in ways that promote sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction. The United States Department of Energy’s (USDOE’s) Office of Fossil Energy and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) are leading implementation of activities targeted at improving the efficiency of coal-fired power plants in India under the flagship Power Generation Best Practices Project of the Power Generation & Transmission Task Force. NETL has launched a program in India with a few state-owned generating companies to demonstrate some of the best practices used in U.S. power plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207