MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182704331 · doi:10.7202/1033191ar

La prise en compte du français dans l’organisation des services en foyers de soins majoritairement anglophones au Canada

2015· article· fr· W2182704331 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jacques Michaud, Éric Forgues, Josée Guignard Noël

Bibliographic record

VenueMinorités linguistiques et société · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MonctonLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’accès aux services de santé en français préoccupe grandement les communautés francophones vivant en situation minoritaire. Le présent article offre un survol de l’espace francophone dans les résidences collectives d’aînés du Nouveau-Brunswick, de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de l’Ontario à la lumière d’une recherche exploratoire menée en 2012. L’analyse des données obtenues auprès d’aînés, d’aidants et du personnel, l’examen de la répartition géographique des résidences et de la population d’aînés francophones, ainsi qu’un aperçu du contexte réglementaire encadrant le fonctionnement de ces résidences permettent de définir la problématique pertinente. Des actions en vue d’améliorer la situation sont examinées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinorités linguistiques et sociétéSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207