MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182776516 · doi:10.1017/s1481803500006175

Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale

2002· article· en· W2182776516 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ian G. Stiell, George A. Wells, R.Douglas McKnight, Robert J. Brison, Howard Lesiuk, Catherine M. Clement, Mary A. Eisenhauer, Gary H. Greenberg, Iain MacPhail, Mark Reardon, James Worthington, P. Richard Verbeek, Jonathan Dreyer, Daniel T. Cass, Michael J. Schull, Laurie J. Morrison, Brian H. Rowe, Brian R. Holroyd, Glen Bandiera, Andreas Laupacis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCervical spineClinical prediction ruleRadiographyHead traumaDecision ruleHead (geology)Cervical spine injuryHead injuryClinical judgmentClinical decision makingMedical emergencyMedical physicsRadiologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency MedicineSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207