MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182786851 · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)31990-8

Characterization of the basis of lipoprotein [a] lysine-binding heterogeneity

2000· article· en· W2182786851 on OpenAlexaff
Jiazhi Xia, Lorraine F. May, Marlys L. Koschinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipoprotein(a)LipoproteinLysineChemistryRecombinant DNASize-exclusion chromatographyApolipoprotein BUltracentrifugeBiochemistryFibronectinChromatographyLow-density lipoproteinCholesterolEnzymeAmino acidCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein [a] (Lp[a]) are considered to be a risk factor for atherosclerosis, the mechanisms by which Lp[a] mediates its pathogenic effects have not been conclusively determined. The apolipoprotein [a] (apo[a]) component of Lp[a] confers unique structural properties to this lipoprotein, including the ability to bind to lysine residues in biological substrates. It has been shown, however, that only a fraction of plasma Lp[a] (Lp[a]-Lys(+)) binds to lysine-Sepharose in vitro. The nature of the non-lysine-binding Lp[a] fraction in plasma (Lp[a]-Lys(-)) is currently unknown. In the present study, the Lp[a]-Lys(+) fraction was determined in the plasma of six unrelated individuals; the Lp[a]-Lys(+) fraction in these plasma samples ranged from approximately 37 to approximately 48%. Interestingly, purification of the Lp[a] by density gradient ultracentrifugation followed by gel filtration and ion-exchange chromatography resulted in progressive increases in the Lp[a]-Lys(+) fraction. Addition of either purified low density lipoprotein (LDL) or fibronectin to the purified Lp[a] at a 1:1 molar ratio reduced the Lp[a]-Lys(+) fraction (maximal decrease of 34 and 20%, respectively) whereas addition of both fibronectin and LDL to the purified Lp[a] resulted in a further decrease (45% maximally) in this fraction. Similar results were obtained by using a recombinant expression system for apo[a]: addition of a 4-fold molar excess of either LDL or fibronectin to conditioned medium containing metabolically labeled recombinant apo[a] reduced the Lys(+) fraction by 49 and 23%, respectively. Taken together, our data suggest that the lysine-binding heterogeneity of plasma Lp[a] is not primarily an intrinsic property of the lipoprotein, but rather results in large part from its ability to noncovalently associate with abundant plasma components such as LDL and fibronectin. These interactions appear to mask the lysine-binding site in apo[a] kringle IV type 10, which mediates the interaction of Lp[a] with lysine-Sepharose. The contribution of these interactions to the function of Lp[a] in vivo remains to be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207