MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2182821449 · doi:10.4095/211168

Geology of the Mountain Grove pluton, Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville Province, Ontario

2000· report· en· W2182821449 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Davidson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlutonGeologyGeochemistrySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The predominantly mafic Mountain Grove pluton, one of the youngest and most northwesterly members of the 1180-1150 Ma Frontenac plutonic suite, comprises two distinct intrusions. Both cut a previously folded succession of amphibolitic schist, siliceous schist, and marble. Coarse-grained norite and leuconorite characterize the northern unit, whereas hornblende gabbro and diorite with subordinate commingled monzonite and syenite characterize the southern, younger one. Commingled intrusions in the northern unit and its country rocks, and foliated biotite quartz syenite to the south, are probably both related to the southern unit. The northern unit likely formed from relatively uncontaminated magma, whereas the southern unit evolved from gabbro by magma mixing, incomplete where commingled. Copper-nickel-iron sulphide mineralization is associated with the northern unit, and sphalerite with marble enclaves in the southern unit. The Mountain Grove pluton is intruded by the Leggat Lake and McLean granite-syenite plutons to the east and southwest respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→