MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2182847294 · doi:10.24972/ijts.2013.32.1.64

Dreaming and Reality: A Neuroanthropological Account

2013· article· en· W2182847294 on OpenAlexaff
Charles D. Laughlin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Transpersonal Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscendental numberConsciousnessDreamInterpretation (philosophy)Natural (archaeology)EpistemologyRealismSet (abstract data type)Expression (computer science)Social realitySociologyPsychologyPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

planet-monophasic and polyphasic (Laughlin, 2011, pp.62-66; Laughlin, McManus & d'Aquili, 1990, p. 293).In modern materialistic, technocratic societies, children are typically taught to disattend to their dreams and to focus on waking interactions with the external physical and social world (see Mageo, 2003b;Wax, 2004).Children are taught from infancy that dreams are not real-that they are a fiction ("just a dream")-and that they just happen for no apparent reason and can be ignored.Elementary schools typically do not address one's dream life (see King, Welt, & Bulkeley, 2011), and information obtained in dreams, if any, bears little or no relevance to the waking world.Dreams, therefore, tend not to inform culture all that much, especially with respect to people's spiritual life. 2 These societies manifest what is called monophasic cultures (Laughlin, McManus, & d'Aquili, 1990, p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.017
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Transpersonal Studies→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→