MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182874561 · doi:10.55095/achot2014/010

Current Concepts Review: Open Tibial Fractures

2014· article· la· W2182874561 on OpenAlexaff
P. J. SHARR, Richard Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2014
Typearticle
Languagela
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCurrent (fluid)OrthodonticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TYPE IClean wound of less than 1 cm in length with a simple fracture pattern TYPE II Wound larger than 1 cm in length without extensive soft tissue damage and a simple fracture pattern TYPE III Wound associated with extensive soft tissue damage Or, multifragmentary fracture, segmental fractures or bone loss Or, severe crush injuries Or, severe contamination of wound Or, vascular injury requiring repair Further subdivision of type III open fractures A: Adequate soft-tissue (periosteal) coverage despite extensive soft tissue damage B: Bone exposure or significant periosteal stripping, or major wound contamination C: Associated arterial injury requiring repairFig. 1.Gustilo classification of open fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae CechoslovacaSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207