MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183040397 · doi:10.36510/learnland.v7i2.662

An Important Reminder: Structuring a Classroom Environment That Honours All Students

2014· article· en· W2183040397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLEARNing Landscapes · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeStructuringSpace (punctuation)Affect (linguistics)Mathematics educationPedagogyPsychologyComputer scienceCommunicationArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All children, regardless of ability, should feel valued and respected in their classroom. At times, the children who struggle miss out on purpose-driven, meaningful learning because they are classified by what they cannot do instead of honoured for what they can do. Through my narrative of Henry, I explore the importance of truly coming to know each student as a learner in the classroom. I begin by reflecting on my own experiences in school as a student and then as a beginning teacher. I then explore the use of the reader’s workshop model and discuss how I have used it as an approach to differentiated teaching and learning in a way that creates space for relationships to grow and students to be supported. Finally, I conclude by revisiting my story of Henry and reflect on how his story, and implementing the reader’s workshop model, will continue to affect my teaching as I grow both as a teacher and learner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it