Disinfestation of Hessian fly puparia in small rectangular hay bales using a laboratory heat treatment unit
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C) was circulated through three control mesh bags containing infested wheat seedlings. An estimated number of 1220 puparia were used for each disinfestation test and the control. The density of the bales ranged from 113 to 148 kg/m 3 , and the initial moisture content ranged from 8.5 to 9.9% wet basis. The average temperatures used in the heat treatment ranged from 73 to 76 o C, and the average relative humidity ranged from 39 to 53%. The thermally treated insect bags and the controls were sent for emergence test. About 241 insects survived out of the approximate number of 1220 puparia used as control. This represented a pre-treatment viability of about 20%, which was unexpectedly low. The thermal treatment ensured a total mortality of the Hessian fly puparia. This study has shown that thermal treatment could be used to disinfest hay bales to meet quarantine and phytosanitary regulations. Keywords: Hessian fly, disinfestation, baled hay, forage, thermal treatment, quarantine,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it