The roles of the citizen practitioner in citizen engagement for architecture, urban design, and planning policy: A Phronesis-based approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The challenges facing citizen participation/engagement in policy are a pressing area of concern for architects, urban designers, planners, policy-makers, and researchers. This dissertation explores the relationships between citizens and their representatives or professionals, with an emphasis on the nature of their participation in matters of policy in such communities. The purpose of this work is to advance a Phronesis-based approach as a transformative participatory perspective, enabling direct communication between ordinary citizens and their representatives or professionals, through an interface of Phronesis and citizen participation/engagement for architecture, urban design and planning policy design, development and implementation. The scope of this study is: 1. an evaluation of the current state of research on citizen participation/engagement policy strategies through a variety of literature reviews, addressing all predisposed findings through a phronetic lens. 2. An exploration of the roles of the individual in a community as a "citizen practitioner", whose life experiences and practical knowledge shape that individual's self-narrative and community level of participation and enriches local place knowledge transmission in architecture, urban design, and planning policy strategies and outcomes. 3. An application of the Aristotelian concept of Phronesis to examine the intersection of authority/expertise vs. knowledge in a conceptual framework driven by several exploratory questions and the research question: How can current architecture, urban design, and planning research methods and practices concerned with citizen participation/engagement in policy be redefined as learning systems in a Phronesis-dominant approach? A. The methodology of this work employs a fully integrated mixed model design in a triangulation of three research methods: a primary method, a secondary method, and a tertiary method. Meta-research analysis was conducted of the work of influential writers on citizen participation/engagement, in policy. This is followed by a comparative analysis of two competing paradigms, two case studies and a thematic analysis of secondary semi-structured interviews with second-homeowners in Central Ontario, Canada. B. The findings indicate that current citizen participation/engagement strategies in policy are lacking in effectiveness, relevancy, validity, credibility. The lack of emphasis on value, trust and meaning in dialogues between citizens and their representatives or professionals are some among other challenges. Findings also indicate that in order to overcome such challenges, architecture, urban design, and planning participatory policy strategies can be redefined as learning systems in a Phronesis-based approach, characterized by three components: context, value-rationality, and praxis. Conclusions reached are that there exists a very real necessity for face-to-face interaction and relationship building between people to occur at an individual level, along the lines delineated by a Phronesis-based approach utilizing the life experience-based self-narrative of the citizen practitioner, as a relevant and effective means of transmitting and exchanging local place knowledge between citizens and their representatives. Limitations of this study include compromised effectiveness in a politically charged context and partial or misconceived interpretation and implementation, as well as and resistance by officials, professionals and academicians to the approach and its associated terms. This study contributes a conceptual framework that explicitly integrates knowledge and learning into an understanding of authority and expertise, and redefines classical case study research and practice. It also provides an original contribution to the research, education and practice of policy-oriented participatory processes in architecture, urban design and planning with an impact that extends to other fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".