MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183083843 · doi:10.82308/34624

The roles of the citizen practitioner in citizen engagement for architecture, urban design, and planning policy: A Phronesis-based approach

2013· article· en· W2183083843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Basil Schaban-Maurer

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitecturePhronesisCitizen scienceUrban planningPublic relationsPolitical scienceKnowledge managementProcess managementComputer scienceBusinessEngineeringEpistemologyGeographyCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The challenges facing citizen participation/engagement in policy are a pressing area of concern for architects, urban designers, planners, policy-makers, and researchers. This dissertation explores the relationships between citizens and their representatives or professionals, with an emphasis on the nature of their participation in matters of policy in such communities. The purpose of this work is to advance a Phronesis-based approach as a transformative participatory perspective, enabling direct communication between ordinary citizens and their representatives or professionals, through an interface of Phronesis and citizen participation/engagement for architecture, urban design and planning policy design, development and implementation. The scope of this study is: 1. an evaluation of the current state of research on citizen participation/engagement policy strategies through a variety of literature reviews, addressing all predisposed findings through a phronetic lens. 2. An exploration of the roles of the individual in a community as a "citizen practitioner", whose life experiences and practical knowledge shape that individual's self-narrative and community level of participation and enriches local place knowledge transmission in architecture, urban design, and planning policy strategies and outcomes. 3. An application of the Aristotelian concept of Phronesis to examine the intersection of authority/expertise vs. knowledge in a conceptual framework driven by several exploratory questions and the research question: How can current architecture, urban design, and planning research methods and practices concerned with citizen participation/engagement in policy be redefined as learning systems in a Phronesis-dominant approach? A. The methodology of this work employs a fully integrated mixed model design in a triangulation of three research methods: a primary method, a secondary method, and a tertiary method. Meta-research analysis was conducted of the work of influential writers on citizen participation/engagement, in policy. This is followed by a comparative analysis of two competing paradigms, two case studies and a thematic analysis of secondary semi-structured interviews with second-homeowners in Central Ontario, Canada. B. The findings indicate that current citizen participation/engagement strategies in policy are lacking in effectiveness, relevancy, validity, credibility. The lack of emphasis on value, trust and meaning in dialogues between citizens and their representatives or professionals are some among other challenges. Findings also indicate that in order to overcome such challenges, architecture, urban design, and planning participatory policy strategies can be redefined as learning systems in a Phronesis-based approach, characterized by three components: context, value-rationality, and praxis. Conclusions reached are that there exists a very real necessity for face-to-face interaction and relationship building between people to occur at an individual level, along the lines delineated by a Phronesis-based approach utilizing the life experience-based self-narrative of the citizen practitioner, as a relevant and effective means of transmitting and exchanging local place knowledge between citizens and their representatives. Limitations of this study include compromised effectiveness in a politically charged context and partial or misconceived interpretation and implementation, as well as and resistance by officials, professionals and academicians to the approach and its associated terms. This study contributes a conceptual framework that explicitly integrates knowledge and learning into an understanding of authority and expertise, and redefines classical case study research and practice. It also provides an original contribution to the research, education and practice of policy-oriented participatory processes in architecture, urban design and planning with an impact that extends to other fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0120.088
Scholarly communication0.0240.037
Open science0.0030.019
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207