MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183201116 · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-82-7-1785

Genomic organization of RNA2 of Tomato ringspot virus: processing at a third cleavage site in the N-terminal region of the polyprotein in vitro

2001· article· en· W2183201116 on OpenAlexaff
Karma Carrier, Yu Xiang, Hélène Sanfaçon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Virology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVirologyCleavage (geology)Terminal (telecommunication)NepovirusIn vitroVirusPlant virusGeneticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proteinase of Tomato ringspot virus (genus Nepovirus) is responsible for proteolytic cleavage of the RNA2-encoded polyprotein (P2) at two cleavage sites, allowing definition of the domains for the movement protein (MP) and coat protein. In this study, we have characterized a third cleavage site in the N-terminal region of P2 using an in vitro processing assay and partial cDNA clones. Results from site-directed mutagenesis of putative cleavage sites suggest that cleavage occurs at dipeptide Q(301)/G. Cleavage at this site is predicted to result in the release of two proteins from the N-terminal region of P2: a 34 kDa protein located at the N terminus of P2 (assuming translation initiation at the first AUG codon) and a 71 kDa protein located immediately upstream of the MP domain. In contrast, only one protein domain is present in the equivalent region of the P2 polyprotein of other characterized nepoviruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General VirologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207