MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183224764 · doi:10.29309/tpmj/2014.21.05.2501

THE FUNCTIONAL E1–E2 HETERODIMER HCV GLYCOPROTEINS

2018· article· en· W2183224764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Medical Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycoproteinEctodomainCD81Cell biologyVirologyMembrane glycoproteinsTransmembrane proteinBiologyBiochemistryHepatitis C virusVirusReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The two HCV envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2 are released fromHCV polyprotein by signal peptidase cleavages. These glycoproteins are type I transmembraneproteins with a highly glycosylated N-terminal ectodomain and a C-terminal hydrophobicanchor. Methods and pathways: After their synthesis, HCV glycoproteins E1 and E2 associateas a non covalent heterodimer. The transmembrane domains of HCV envelope glycoproteinsplay a major role in E1–E2 heterodimer assembly and subcellular localization. The envelopeglycoprotein complex E1–E2 has been proposed to be essential for HCV entry. Results andconclusions: However, for a long time, HCV entry studies have been limited by the lack of arobust cell culture system for HCV replication and viral particle production. Recently, a modelmimicking the entry process of HCV lifecycle has been developed by pseudo typing retroviralparticles with native HCV envelope glycoproteins, allowing the characterization of functionalE1–E2 envelope glycoproteins., we review our understanding to date on the assembly of thefunctional HCV glycoprotein heterodimer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it