Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Font formats are a tug of war between artists (designers and drawers), programmers (computer scientists), the business world, and users. Each of these four groups has had an influence on the paththatfontformatshavefollowed. Wereviewthesuccessesandfailures,andpresentawishlist of properties that a good font format should have. Résumé Les formats defontes ont depuis toujoursétéuntir à la cordeentreles artistes(graphistes et dessinateurs de fontes), les programmeurs (informaticiens), le monde des affaires et les utilisateurs. Chacun parmi ces groupes a influencé l’itinéraire historique que les formats de fonte ont suivi ces vingt dernièresannées. Nousallons,danscetteprésentation,revoirlessuccèsetleséchecsdesformatsdefonte,etnous allons présenter une liste de vœux des propriétés que nous considérons qu’un bon format de fonte devrait avoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it