MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183262804 · doi:10.19030/iber.v9i12.347

Internationalization And Profitability Of The U.S. Multinational Companies After The Free Trade Agreement

2010· article· en· W2183262804 on OpenAlexaff
Ayşe Yüce, Sergiy Rakhmanyil

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexInternationalizationMultinational corporationBusinessLiberalizationFree trade agreementInternational tradeDegree (music)International economicsIndustrial organizationFree tradeEconomicsMarket economyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the effect of North American liberalization on the degree of internationalization and profitability of US companies using industry-level data between 1985 and 2005. We find evidence of long-run increases in the degree of internationalization and evidence pointing at increases in firm profitability in the short and long run for US companies following the introduction of NAFTA. We find cross-sectional variation in the degree of internationalization and profitability for US industry sectors. Overall, our results indicate that the process of liberalization has had a positive impact on both the degree of internationalization and on firm profitability for US companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER)Same topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207