MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183303565

EXAMINING SOCIAL CAPITAL AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: TACKLING MEASUREMENT DEBATES, NEIGHBOURHOOD CORRELATES, AND GENDER DIFFERENCES.

2012· article· en· W2183303565 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Emma Bassett

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSocial capitalPsychosocialNeighbourhood (mathematics)Depression (economics)Depressive symptomsPsychologyPublic healthPsychiatrySociologySocial psychologyGerontologySocial scienceMedicineEconomicsAnxiety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depression is the most common mental illness worldwide, and although aspects of the social environment, including social capital and neighbourhood disadvantage, have been linked to depression, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood.Debates within the social capital and neighbourhood disadvantage literatures have yielded mixed findings in studies of depression and an understanding of how social capital may differentially relate to symptomatology in men and women must be solidified.In the first manuscript of this thesis, I assess whether (1) network and psychosocial measures of individual social capital are each associated with depressive symptoms, and (2) the association varies according to whether the capital lies outside or inside an individual's neighbourhood.The second manuscript investigates whether: (1) neighbourhood disadvantage has a stronger association with depression in women compared to men and ( 2) if specific social capital factors mediate the association between neighbourhood disadvantage and depression.Data came from the Montreal Neighbourhood Networks and Healthy Aging Study conducted in 2008.Data included telephone interview responses from 2624 adults from 300 census tracts in the Montreal metropolitan area.The CESD-10 instrument was used to assess depressive symptoms.Name and position generator instruments and self-reported questions were used to assess psychosocial and network components of social capital.Multilevel logistic regressions adjusted for a range of socio-demographic and economic characteristics.Manuscript 1 resultsindicated that core tie diversity as well as the psychosocial measures of generalized trust, trust in neighbours, and perceptions of neighbourhood cohesion may be beneficial to those suffering from depressive symptoms.Manuscript 2 results, stratified by gender, indicated that neighbourhood disadvantage was associated with depressive symptoms in women only and iii that perceived neighbourhood cohesion mediated this association.Core tie diversity, generalized trust and trust in neighbours were associated with depression in women but did not act as mediating variables.It is suggested that network and psychosocial, as well as general-and neighbourhood specific measures of social capital be included in studies of depressive symptoms.Health promotion initiatives meant to combat depression may wish to consider the gender differences in the design and implementation of neighbourhood or peerbased programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207