MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2183308724

Changing Arctic Seas: A Brief Look at Scale, Pattern, Advection and Connection

2015· article· en· W2183308724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eddy C. Carmack

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticOceanographySubarctic climateEnvironmental scienceArctic ecologyClimatologyClimate changeMarine ecosystemGlobal changeGeographyEcosystemGeologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(5th floor, Wallace Building) Abstract: To understand the fast changes taking place in the Arctic Ocean requires that we look at the underlying process governing horizontal and vertical fluxes, and the Arctic's two-way connection with the global climate system. To demonstrate this point, data collected from Canadian icebreakers annually encircling northern North America are used to document the connectivities among the Arctic Ocean and neighbouring subarctic Pacific and Atlantic oceans and to explore how changes within this coupled physical system have triggered cascading changes within the biogeochemical system which are now broadly impacting marine ecosystems, ocean acidification and possibly the food security of Northern residents. A changing Arctic Ocean also acts back on the global system, with potential impacts on ocean currents and global precipitation patterns. There is an opportunity: by looking at and understanding the rapid and non-linear changes that taking place in the Arctic, and working more closely with Northern residents in the monitoring of change, we may develop new tools to manage and cope with emerging global-scale issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Russian Policy Studies→French-language works237,207→