MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183343084

Multiple thermotectonic events in a continuous metamorphic sequence, Mica Creek area, southeastern Canadian Cordillera

2003· article· en· W2183343084 on OpenAlexaffabout
James L. Crowley, E. D. Ghent, Sharon D. Carr, P S Simony, Michael A. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaCarleton UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKyaniteMetamorphismGeologySchistMetamorphic rockMonaziteSillimaniteGeochemistryGneissGeochronologyZirconPaleontologyQuartzBiotite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U-(Th)-Pb isotope dilution and SHRIMP dating indicates that multiple periods of metamorphism and deformation occurred between ∼160 and 60 Ma in the Mica Creek area, southeastern Canadian Cordillera. The metamorphic sequence (Barrovian assemblages in the garnet zone through the sillimanite-K-feldspar zone), fold generations, and Neoproterozoic stratigraphy are apparently continuous across the area, yet it broadly lies between regions that were tectonized at different times, Middle Jurassic to the east and middle Cretaceous-Paleocene to the west. Our dating along a north (lowest metamorphic grade) to south (highest grade) transect shows that three, km-scale tectonic age domains exist. In garnet schist of domain 1, peak metamorphism occurred at ∼163 Ma and a minor thermal overprint occurred at 70-60 Ma. In migmatitic kyanite schist of domain 2, monazite inclusions in garnet grew at 110 Ma, matrix monazite and monazite inclusions in kyanite grew at -85-73 Ma, and rims of some grains grew at ∼60 Ma. Kyanite growth during peak metamorphism must have occurred after 73 Ma, possibly during intrusion of 61 Ma leucosome. In migmatitic kyanite schist and sillimanite schist of domain 3, peak metamorphism occurred at 99-93 Ma, and lesser thermal events occurred at -280, 160, 110, and 70 Ma. We thus conclude that the thermal peak of metamorphism took place at different times in each domain, with peak events coinciding with secondary events in other domains. Age constraints on S 1 + 2 are provided by dating variably deformed granitoid rocks. S 1 + 2 developed before 72 Ma in domain 1, at least partly at 61-58 Ma and 122-63 Ma in domains 2 and 3, respectively. Our findings show that the Mica Creek area is the only known region in the southeastern Canadian Cordillera that was affected by the five recognized major periods of tectonism (175-160, 141-120, 110, 100-90, and 75-50 Ma). The key to understanding the geologic history is determining why several metamorphic and deformation events spanning 100 Myr occurred within a single tectonometamorphic complex with apparent geologic continuity. If continuity is only apparent, the domains may have been tectonically assembled along cryptic, unrecognized shear zones. However, if continuity does indeed exist, the events must have been locally superimposed on the complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207