MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2183386174 · doi:10.4095/211164

Granite-greenstone relationships at the southeastern Sturgeon belt margin in the Brightsand forest area, Ontario

2000· report· en· W2183386174 on OpenAlexaffabout
J L Brown, J A Percival, Don White, K Y Tomlinson, V J McNicoll

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenstone beltMargin (machine learning)GeologyGeochemistryGeomorphologyGeographyArchean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the southeastern margin of the Sturgeon Lake-Savant Lake greenstone belt, screens of amphibolite-facies supracrustal rocks, separated by plutonic and gneiss units, mark the interface between volcanic rocks of the western Wabigoon and granitoid rocks-gneiss of the central Wabigoon Subprovince. Complex tonalite gneiss records D1 and D2 events not present in supracrustal and other plutonic units which sustained regional D3 and D4 deformation. The complex gneiss may represent depositional basement to supracrustal rocks correlative with the continental margin sequence of the Sturgeon-Savant belt. Alternatively, the fold geometry of this unit can be explained by large-scale fold interference. The steeply north-dipping Hilltop Creek and Robert Lake faults, which appear on LITHOPROBE seismic line 1d as steep truncations, separate the region into metamorphically and lithologically distinct structural panels. The faults are spatially and probably mechanically related to the sinistral Wapikamaiski Lake and Brightsand River shear zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→