Wake Topology of a Cylinder Undergoing Vortex-Induced Vibrations With Elliptic Trajectories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wake vortex shedding topology of a cylinder undergoing vortex-induced vibrations (VIV) is investigated experimentally. Vibration measurements and flow visualization are utilized to study the connection between the cylinder response and the wake topology. The experiments were performed for two different orientations of the elliptic trajectories relative to the incoming flow at a fixed Reynolds number, moment of inertia ratio, mass ratio, and reduced velocity. Similar to the classical 2P regime, two counter-rotating vortex pairs are produced per oscillating cycle for both cases of elliptic trajectories examined here. However, significant changes in wake vortex dynamics are observed along the cylinder span. These changes include merging of vortices, which leads to shedding patterns similar to 2S and P + S modes downstream of the vortex formation region. The observed changes in vortex dynamics are accompanied by splitting of spanwise vortex filament and are attributed primarily to the changes in the local amplitude of vibrations along the span of the pivoted cylinder. It is shown that, being dependent on both the local amplitude of vibrations and vortex dynamics, the observed wake topology cannot be captured by the classical map of shedding regimes developed for VIV of one degree-of-freedom (DOF) cylinders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".